<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Photoshop &amp; Lightroom Explored</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnesberg.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnesberg.com</link>
	<description>Adobe Lightroom Passion Explored.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Lightroom 2 Raw Workflow by markus</title>
		<link>http://johnesberg.com/2008/09/11/lightroom-2-raw-workflow/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnesberg.com/?p=377#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

I love your analogy comparing the crates!

I too shoot only raw for much the same reasons as you. Back when I shot non-digital I was shooting Hasselblad and one comment I always received is that the photos were so clear.

Well I can't afford Hasselblad digital yet, so I'll have to contend with my Canon 30D.  Here the RAW files are only 8 Meg in size and when you consider how cheap hard disks are today it's well worth shooting RAW to get the most out of your shots.

One thing confused me in your post though. You wrote,
&lt;blockquote&gt;Hence, &lt;strong&gt;raw&lt;/strong&gt; is the only format that recieves automatic adjustments such as sharpening when the images are loaded:  prevents overkill.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
and in the next paragraph you wrote;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Raw on the other hand will boost you up ...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

These two statements seem to contradict one another.

Anyway, keep up the splendid work.

Cheers, Markus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>I love your analogy comparing the crates!</p>
<p>I too shoot only raw for much the same reasons as you. Back when I shot non-digital I was shooting Hasselblad and one comment I always received is that the photos were so clear.</p>
<p>Well I can&#8217;t afford Hasselblad digital yet, so I&#8217;ll have to contend with my Canon 30D.  Here the RAW files are only 8 Meg in size and when you consider how cheap hard disks are today it&#8217;s well worth shooting RAW to get the most out of your shots.</p>
<p>One thing confused me in your post though. You wrote,</p>
<blockquote><p>Hence, <strong>raw</strong> is the only format that recieves automatic adjustments such as sharpening when the images are loaded:  prevents overkill.</p></blockquote>
<p>and in the next paragraph you wrote;</p>
<blockquote><p>Raw on the other hand will boost you up &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>These two statements seem to contradict one another.</p>
<p>Anyway, keep up the splendid work.</p>
<p>Cheers, Markus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe Lightroom 2 &#038; The Adjustment Brush by ** John Esberg **</title>
		<link>http://johnesberg.com/2008/09/06/background-corrections-with-the-adjustment-brush/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>** John Esberg **</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnesberg.com/?p=343#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Markus,

There is no doubt that people love this tool.  It certainly adds a new edge to the normal workflow process for photographers.

John Esberg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Markus,</p>
<p>There is no doubt that people love this tool.  It certainly adds a new edge to the normal workflow process for photographers.</p>
<p>John Esberg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe Lightroom 2 &#038; The Adjustment Brush by Markus Jais</title>
		<link>http://johnesberg.com/2008/09/06/background-corrections-with-the-adjustment-brush/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Jais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnesberg.com/?p=343#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Another great video from you. Thank's a lot. It really shows how to use the new adjustment brush. I think this is probably the coolest of all new features of LR2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great video from you. Thank&#8217;s a lot. It really shows how to use the new adjustment brush. I think this is probably the coolest of all new features of LR2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2.0 Shortcuts by Markus Jais</title>
		<link>http://johnesberg.com/2008/08/22/adobe-photoshop-lightroom-20-shortcuts/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Jais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnesberg.com/?p=199#comment-19</guid>
		<description>John, 

your tutorials are great. Thanks a lot for sharing this.

Markus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, </p>
<p>your tutorials are great. Thanks a lot for sharing this.</p>
<p>Markus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2.0 Shortcuts by John_Esberg</title>
		<link>http://johnesberg.com/2008/08/22/adobe-photoshop-lightroom-20-shortcuts/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>John_Esberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnesberg.com/?p=199#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the compliment.  It's greatly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the compliment.  It&#8217;s greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
